Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Leads PassMark Single-Thread Leaderboard

Low Boon Shen
2 Min Read

Despite Intel has yet to announce the upcoming Core Ultra 9 285K (though there’s more than enough leaks to know it is happening), popular benchmarking software PassMark has already announced the aforementioned CPU as the new winner in the single-thread ranking.

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K: 8% Faster In Single-Thread

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Leads PassMark Single-Thread Leaderboard - 19
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Leads PassMark Single-Thread Leaderboard

PassMark Software announced on X (Twitter) the new Arrow Lake-based processor as the new leader in the single-thread CPU Mark ranking, with an 8% margin over the current-best, the Intel Core i9-14900KS. Notably, the 14th Gen processor has a boost clock of 6.2GHz, whereas the Core Ultra 9 is rumored to hit up to 5.7GHz – this means we should see a pretty solid boost in IPC (instructions per clock) with the new (presumably) Lion Cove P-core architecture.

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Leads PassMark Single-Thread Leaderboard - 21
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Leads PassMark Single-Thread Leaderboard

In fact, the benchmark entry has given us a pretty detailed look at the processor’s specs: 8 P-Cores with 5.7GHz boost clock, and 16 E-Cores with 4.6GHz boost clock. This entry also suggests that hyperthreading is no longer present, and multi-core performance is 22% slower than the Core i9, although it’s worth taking a small grain of salt here given that PassMark doesn’t rule out the possibility of it being an engineering sample, but results “are looking good.”

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Leads PassMark Single-Thread Leaderboard - 23
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Leads PassMark Single-Thread Leaderboard

We also don’t know what are the power targets this CPU is running on, and this can be a major factor in determining the processor’s multi-core performance. Intel is reportedly raising the peak power limit up to 295W on the top-tier models to give it extra boost that might be just enough to surpass the current flagships despite the lack of hyperthreaded cores.

Source: Videocardz

Pokdepinion: Looking good indeed – although the elephant in the room at this point really comes down to multi-core performance, now that hyperthreading is gone.

Share This Article
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *